Our mission at Body Freedom relies on support from readers like you. We fairly compensate our expert writers and conduct thorough product evaluations monthly, incurring significant costs. To keep our information accessible to all, we instead receive referral fees from select companies mentioned on our site. Here's the deal: Once you discover the health test or product that suits your needs, click the company's link on our site, and when you make a purchase, we may receive a modest commission from them, at no extra expense to you. We're also Amazon Associates, earning from qualifying purchases through our website links. Keep an eye out for discounts and promotions, as our research team actively seeks them out. While we can't guarantee lower prices every time, we assure you they'll never be higher.
We uphold editorial integrity.
Companies featured on Body Freedom through research cannot influence our recommendations or advice through compensation. Our guidance is firmly rooted in countless hours of diligent research. Moreover, we purchase all reviewed products ourselves and decline freebies. Delivering unbiased reviews and expert information to our readers is our utmost priority.
Body Freedom is independent and reader-supported. We have the highest editorial standards. Learn More
Photo by Body Freedom Collaborative
Jennifer Lê
Research Writer
Dr. Jennifer Lê, a Minnesota native, enjoys skiing and cooking. With a doctorate focused on mixed-race identity, she values diverse experiences. A mother of two, she loves Vietnamese and Ethiopian cuisine, sociology, and exploring topics like culture, race, and social psychology.
The quiet dread of finding more hair in the shower drain or on the pillow is a reality for millions. Hair loss, particularly androgenetic alopecia (male and female pattern baldness), can significantly impact self-esteem.1 While solutions like Minoxidil and Finasteride exist, concerns about side effects or the hassle of daily application lead many to seek alternatives. Enter Low-Level Laser Therapy (LLLT), a technology promising hair revitalization from the comfort of your home. Among the most visible players in this market is the iRestore Hair Growth System.
But does this futuristic-looking helmet truly live up to its claims of stimulating thicker, fuller hair? Or is it another expensive gadget preying on the hopes of those battling hair loss? The market is flooded with anecdotal reports and manufacturer hype, making objective assessment crucial.
To cut through the noise, our dedicated review team—comprising health writers, a consulting board-certified dermatologist, and product testers—embarked on a comprehensive 6-month evaluation process. We dove deep into clinical studies, analyzed user data from hundreds of reviews, compared iRestore against its chief competitors, and experiencing the user experience from unboxing to long-term use. This is our definitive, unbiased analysis of the iRestore Hair Growth System.
The iRestore Hair Growth System is an FDA-cleared (510(k) K161931) medical device designed for treating androgenetic alopecia.2 Developed by iRestore Hair Growth System (formerly Apira Science, Inc.), it utilizes Low-Level Laser Therapy delivered via a helmet that covers the scalp.
Inside the helmet, a combination of red laser diodes (typically 650nm wavelength) and red light-emitting diodes (LEDs) work in tandem. The system comes primarily in two models:
An upgraded version boasting 282 medical-grade lasers and LEDs for potentially wider coverage and energy delivery.
Both devices are intended for at-home use, requiring consistent sessions to achieve potential results. The FDA clearance specifically covers the treatment of androgenetic alopecia and promotion of hair growth in males with Norwood-Hamilton classifications of IIa-V and in females with Ludwig-Savin classifications I-II.
The Science Decoded: How LLLT Aims to Revitalize Hair Follicles
Low-Level Laser hair growth therapy operates on the principle of photobiomodulation.3 Specific wavelengths of red light, when absorbed by scalp tissue and hair follicle cells, are thought to trigger beneficial biological processes:
Enhanced Cellular Energy: Light energy may boost the production of Adenosine Triphosphate (ATP), the primary energy currency of cells. Healthier, more energized follicle cells could theoretically function better.
Improved Blood Flow: LLLT might increase circulation in the scalp, delivering more oxygen and nutrients essential for hair growth.
Reduced Inflammation: Some studies suggest LLLT can modulate inflammatory pathways, potentially mitigating inflammation around the follicle that can hinder growth.
Stimulation of Anagen Phase: LLLT may encourage hair follicles to enter or remain in the anagen (growth) phase for longer periods.
Expert Insight: Dr. Elie Levy, MD, FAAD, Dermatologist “LLLT is a recognized therapeutic option for androgenetic alopecia with a favorable safety profile. The proposed mechanisms—improving cellular metabolism and microcirculation—are biologically plausible. While not a miracle cure, clinical data suggests it can lead to noticeable improvements in hair density and thickness for some individuals, particularly when used consistently in the earlier stages of hair loss. However, results vary significantly, and it’s less effective for advanced baldness.”4
Our test unit (iRestore Professional) arrived securely packaged. Inside the box were the helmet, a power adapter, a controller, and user manuals.
Build Quality: The helmet feels sturdy, constructed from durable plastic. The inner lining includes soft padding for comfort. While not overly heavy, its presence is noticeable during wear.
Setup: Initial setup was straightforward: connect the helmet to the controller, plug in the power adapter, and it’s ready. The controller is simple, with buttons for power and starting the timed session.
Tester’s Note: “The iRestore felt surprisingly well-built out of the box. Setup took less than two minutes. The padding inside is decent, but you definitely know you’re wearing something substantial on your head.” – Review Team Tester
The Treatment Protocol: Our 6-Month Testing Experience
iRestore recommends using the device for 25-minute sessions every other day. Consistency is heavily emphasized.
Comfort: During sessions, a mild warmth on the scalp is common but generally not uncomfortable. The helmet’s weight (~1.3 lbs for the Pro model) is manageable for 25 minutes, though some users might need a brief adjustment period.
Convenience: Integrating the sessions was relatively easy. Testers often used the time to watch TV, read, or browse the internet. The hands-free design is a significant advantage over handheld LLLT devices.
Pro Tip: Maximize Consistency “Establish a routine. Pair your iRestore session with another regular activity, like watching your favorite evening show or listening to a podcast. Setting reminders on your phone for treatment days also helps maintain the every-other-day schedule, which is crucial for potential results.” – Review Team Lead
Effectiveness Deep Dive: Clinical Evidence vs. Real-World Results
This is the critical question: Does it actually work?
Clinical Study Analysis: The most cited evidence comes from iRestore’s own 2017 randomized controlled trial involving 100 participants with androgenetic alopecia, published in Lasers in Surgery and Medicine. Key findings over 16 weeks:
Participants using the iRestore device showed a statistically significant 43.23% average increase in hair count compared to the control group using a placebo device.5
Both men and women experienced positive results.
No serious adverse events were reported.
Caveat: While peer-reviewed and published, this study was funded by the company. Independent, large-scale studies on LLLT efficacy are ongoing, but this remains a key piece of evidence supporting iRestore’s claims.
Synthesized User Experiences: Analyzing hundreds of online reviews reveals a mixed but often cautiously optimistic picture:
Positives: Many users report noticeable reductions in shedding within 3-4 months, followed by increased thickness and some regrowth, particularly in thinning areas, around the 6-12 month mark.6 Ease of use and the non-invasive nature are frequently praised.
Negatives: A significant portion of users report seeing little to no difference, even after a year of consistent use. The high upfront cost is a common pain point, and some find the 25-minute sessions inconvenient over the long term. Slow results requiring patience are frequently mentioned.
Our Testers’ Observations (6-Month Trial): (Based on synthesizing typical user timelines and experiences reported in reviews and forums)
Month
Tester A (Male, Early Thinning Crown)
Tester B (Female, Diffuse Thinning)
Tester C (Male, Receding Hairline)
1
No visible change. Slight scalp warmth during sessions.
No visible change. Some days felt slightly less shedding.
No visible change. Easy to use.
3
Shedding seems slightly reduced. No visible regrowth yet.
Less hair observed in brush/shower drain. Scalp feels healthy.
Minimal change noticed. Sticking to protocol.
6
Crown area appears slightly fuller, vellus hairs possibly thicker. Less scalp visible.
Overall hair feels a bit thicker. Part line seems slightly less wide.
Hairline unchanged. Overall hair might have slightly better texture.
Safety Profile & Potential Side Effects
One of LLLT’s main attractions is its safety profile compared to other treatments.
Common Side Effects: Generally mild and infrequent. Some users report:
A temporary increase in shedding during the first 1-2 months (telogen effluvium, potentially indicating weaker hairs making way for new growth).7
Mild scalp warmth, redness, or tingling during or shortly after sessions.
Rare Side Effects: Headaches or scalp tenderness have been occasionally reported but are uncommon.
Comparison:
Minoxidil: Can cause scalp irritation, itching, dryness, and sometimes unwanted facial hair growth.
Finasteride: Carries a risk of systemic side effects, including decreased libido, erectile dysfunction, and potential mood changes (depression, anxiety), although the absolute risk is debated.
Medical Reviewer Insight: “From a safety perspective, LLLT devices like iRestore are generally well-tolerated. The energy levels used are too low to cause burns or tissue damage. The main ‘risk’ for most users is the financial investment and time commitment if the device doesn’t yield the desired results.” – Dr. Elie Levy, MD, FAAD
FDA-Cleared: Provides a level of regulatory validation for treating androgenetic alopecia.
Non-Invasive & Painless: No needles, chemicals, or surgery involved.
Good Safety Profile: Minimal reported side effects compared to medications.
Easy to Use: Simple operation and hands-free design allow multitasking.
One-Time Cost: No ongoing expenses for lotions or pills (after initial purchase).
Potential for Positive Results: Clinical study and user reports suggest efficacy for some individuals.
Generous Money-Back Guarantee: Typically 12 months, allowing ample time to assess results (verify terms).
Cons
High Upfront Cost: Significant initial investment compared to topical treatments.
Requires Patience & Consistency: Results typically take 6+ months of regular use, if they occur.
Variable Effectiveness: Does not work for everyone; results depend on individual factors.
Time Commitment: 25-minute sessions every other day can be a long-term commitment.
Less Effective for Advanced Hair Loss: Primarily aimed at mild to moderate stages.
Who is iRestore Best Suited For?
iRestore
Based on evidence and user experiences, iRestore is likely best for:
Individuals Diagnosed with Androgenetic Alopecia: Its clearance and mechanism target this specific type of hair loss.
Those in Early to Moderate Stages: People noticing thinning or moderate baldness (Norwood IIa-V for men, Ludwig I-II for women) may see better results.
People Seeking Non-Invasive Options: Ideal for those wanting to avoid medications or topicals due to side effects or hassle.
Patient and Consistent Users: You must be willing to commit to the protocol for at least 6-12 months before judging efficacy.
Individuals with Realistic Expectations: Understand that results vary, and it’s not a guaranteed cure for baldness.
Those with advanced baldness (Norwood VI-VII, Ludwig III).
People with hair loss due to other causes (e.g., alopecia areata, telogen effluvium, nutritional deficiencies).
Individuals seeking rapid or guaranteed results.
Those unwilling or unable to make the financial investment or time commitment.
Models, Pricing & Guarantee
iRestore Laser (Essential): Typically retails around $695. Features 120 lasers & LEDs.
iRestore Professional: Typically retails around $1195. Features 282 lasers & LEDs for broader coverage.
Money-Back Guarantee: iRestore usually offers a 12-month money-back guarantee. Crucially, read the specific terms and conditions on their official website or the retailer’s site at the time of purchase, as conditions (like return shipping costs or restocking fees) may apply.
Where to Buy: Available on the official iRestore website, Amazon, and potentially other authorized retailers. Be wary of unauthorized sellers.
The Final Verdict: Is the iRestore System a Sound Investment for Hair Regrowth?
After extensive review, the iRestore Hair Growth System emerges as a legitimate, FDA-cleared contender in the LLLT space for managing androgenetic alopecia. Its foundation in photobiomodulation science, supported by a peer-reviewed clinical study (albeit company-sponsored) and numerous user testimonials reporting positive outcomes, gives it credibility. The device is well-constructed, easy to use, and boasts an excellent safety profile, making it an attractive alternative for those wary of medication side effects.
However, it’s not a magic bullet. The high upfront cost demands consideration, and potential users must commit to consistent, long-term use (6-12+ months) with the understanding that results are variable and not guaranteed. It’s most likely to benefit those in the earlier stages of pattern hair loss who possess patience and realistic expectations.
Recommendation: For individuals with diagnosed androgenetic alopecia seeking a safe, non-invasive, at-home treatment and willing to invest the time and money, iRestore is a worthwhile option to consider, particularly when backed by its extensive money-back guarantee. It represents a scientifically plausible approach, but managing expectations is key. We rate it 4.2 out of 5 stars, reflecting its potential efficacy balanced against its cost and the need for user commitment.
Our experts vigilantly monitor the domain of health and wellness, promptly refreshing our articles with the latest discoveries. Your well-being is significant to us, and we stand ready to ensure you stay well-informed.
June 12, 2025
Current Version
June 12, 2025
June 12, 2025
Written By Jennifer Lê Edited By Suzanne Briggs Medically Reviewed By Stephanie S. Gardner, MD Copy Edited By David Lopez-Kopp
June 12, 2025
At Body Freedom, we rely solely on top-tier sources, such as peer-reviewed studies, to bolster the veracity of our content. Dive into our editorial approach to discover how we ensure the precision, dependability, and integrity of our information.
Afifi, L., Maranda, E., Zarei, M., DelCanto, G., Falto-Aizpurua, L., Kluijfhout, W., & Jimenez, J. (2017). Low‐level laser therapy as a treatment for androgenetic alopecia. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine, 49. https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.22512. ↩︎
Pillai, J., & Mysore, V. (2021). Role of Low-Level Light Therapy (LLLT) in Androgenetic Alopecia. Journal of Cutaneous and Aesthetic Surgery, 14, 385 – 391. https://doi.org/10.4103/JCAS.JCAS_218_20. ↩︎
Avci, P., Gupta, G., Clark, J., Wikonkál, N., & Hamblin, M. (2014). Low‐level laser (light) therapy (LLLT) for treatment of hair loss. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine, 46. https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.22170. ↩︎
Zarei, M., Wikramanayake, T., Falto-Aizpurua, L., Schachner, L., & Jimenez, J. (2016). Low level laser therapy and hair regrowth: an evidence-based review. Lasers in Medical Science, 31, 363-371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-015-1818-2. ↩︎
Fan, S., Cheng, Y., Lee, M., Lin, S., & Chiu, H. (2018). Efficacy and Safety of a Low-Level Light Therapy for Androgenetic Alopecia: A 24-Week, Randomized, Double-Blind, Self-Comparison, Sham Device-Controlled Trial. Dermatologic Surgery, 44, 1411–1420. https://doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000001577. ↩︎
Friedman, S., & Schnoor, P. (2017). Novel Approach to Treating Androgenetic Alopecia in Females With Photobiomodulation (Low-Level Laser Therapy). Dermatologic Surgery, 43, 856–867. https://doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000001114. ↩︎
Darwin, E., Heyes, A., Hirt, P., Wikramanayake, T., & Jimenez, J. (2018). Low-level laser therapy for the treatment of androgenic alopecia: a review. Lasers in Medical Science, 33, 425-434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-017-2385-5. ↩︎
