Body Freedom values transparency.

Our mission at Body Freedom relies on support from readers like you. We fairly compensate our expert writers and conduct thorough product evaluations monthly, incurring significant costs. To keep our information accessible to all, we instead receive referral fees from select companies mentioned on our site. Here's the deal: Once you discover the health test or product that suits your needs, click the company's link on our site, and when you make a purchase, we may receive a modest commission from them, at no extra expense to you. We're also Amazon Associates, earning from qualifying purchases through our website links. Keep an eye out for discounts and promotions, as our research team actively seeks them out. While we can't guarantee lower prices every time, we assure you they'll never be higher.

We uphold editorial integrity.

Companies featured on Body Freedom through research cannot influence our recommendations or advice through compensation. Our guidance is firmly rooted in countless hours of diligent research. Moreover, we purchase all reviewed products ourselves and decline freebies. Delivering unbiased reviews and expert information to our readers is our utmost priority.

Review of Klinio: Lab-Tested Insights on This Diabetes & Weight Loss App – Worth the Hype (and Hassle)?

The App That Promises Simpler Diabetes Management—But at What Cost? Our 3-Month Trial Reveals the Surprising Truth

Maggie Seibel, M.A.
Mental Health Writer

Maggie Seibel, M.A., is an Adjunct Faculty member with degrees in Psychology and Counseling. She teaches multiple psychology courses and is a licensed Mental Health Counselor in Washington State.

The statistics are stark: Over 38 million Americans have diabetes, another 97 million grapple with prediabetes, and obesity rates continue to climb.1 Managing these conditions demands vigilance, knowledge, and consistent effort—a daily battle many find overwhelming. In this landscape, digital health apps have surged, promising personalized guidance and convenient tools right from your smartphone.2 Among the most visible is Klinio, an app specifically targeting diabetes management and weight loss through tailored meal plans and activity tracking.

But with a crowded market and a trail of mixed user reviews—ranging from life-changing success stories to frustrating complaints about billing and generic advice—does Klinio truly deliver on its promises? Is it a revolutionary tool for taking control of your health, or just another slickly marketed app with potential pitfalls?

To cut through the noise, our team—comprising certified nutritionists, fitness experts, and individuals navigating diabetes and weight management themselves—embarked on a rigorous 12-week hands-on testing protocol. We meticulously analyzed Klinio’s features, tracked real-world results, scrutinized its scientific underpinnings, and compared it head-to-head with leading competitors. We also investigated the persistent user concerns that cloud its reputation.

This isn’t just another surface-level review. We dive deep into the app’s functionality, the reality of its “personalization,” the true costs involved, and provide actionable strategies gleaned from our experience. Read on for the definitive, no-nonsense evaluation of Klinio.

Key Questions This Review Answers:

  • What exactly does the Klinio app offer, and how does it work?
  • Is Klinio’s approach backed by solid scientific evidence?
  • What were our testing results for weight loss, glucose control, and usability?
  • How does Klinio stack up against competitors like Noom, WW, and MyFitnessPal?
  • Are the widespread complaints about billing and cancellation justified?
  • Who is Klinio genuinely best suited for, and who should steer clear?

What Exactly is Klinio? A Look Under the Hood

At its core, Klinio is a subscription-based mobile application designed primarily for individuals managing type 2 diabetes, prediabetes, or seeking weight loss. Developed by Kilo Health (a digital wellness company with a portfolio of health apps), Klinio aims to simplify healthy eating and activity through personalized plans delivered via its app interface.3

Core Components & Features:

  • Personalized Meal Plans: Upon signup, users complete a detailed questionnaire about their health status (diagnosis, medications, HbA1c levels), dietary preferences, allergies, activity level, and goals. Klinio’s algorithm uses this data to generate daily/weekly meal plans, including breakfast, lunch, dinner, and snacks.
  • Recipe Database & Grocery Lists: Meal plans come with corresponding recipes, detailing ingredients, instructions, and nutritional information (calories, macros, sugar content).4 The app automatically generates categorized grocery lists based on the selected weekly plan, simplifying shopping.
  • Activity & Workout Plans: Klinio offers a library of guided workout videos, typically focusing on beginner-to-intermediate level bodyweight exercises, stretching, and low-impact cardio. Users can select workouts based on duration and intensity, aiming to complement their nutritional plan.
  • Progress Tracking: The app allows users to log:
    • Weight: Manual entry or potential sync with smart scales (integration varies).
    • Blood Glucose Levels: Manual entry is standard; some versions may offer integration with specific Continuous Glucose Monitors (CGMs) or Blood Glucose Meters (BGMs).
    • HbA1c: Manual entry for tracking long-term glucose control.
    • Activity: Steps can often be synced from phone sensors or fitness trackers (like Fitbit, Apple Watch). Workout completion is logged within the app.
    • Water Intake: Manual logging.5
  • Educational Content: Klinio provides articles, tips, and short guides on topics related to diabetes management, nutrition, exercise, and healthy habits. This aims to improve user knowledge and adherence.
  • Community (Limited): Some versions may offer access to a private Facebook group or similar forum for users to connect, although direct in-app community features are often less robust than competitors.
  • (Potential) Add-Ons & Upsells: Users are frequently offered supplementary products like a Keto diet guide, digital recipe books, or even Klinio-branded supplements at additional cost.

Expert Insight:
“Digital apps like Klinio can provide valuable structure and education, particularly for newly diagnosed individuals overwhelmed by lifestyle changes.6 The key is understanding their limitations – they are tools, not replacements for personalized medical advice or the nuanced support of a human healthcare professional.”
— Erin Phillips, RD, CDCES, Registered Dietitian Nutritionist 


The Science Behind Klinio: Proven Principles, Proprietary Proof?

Klinio doesn’t operate on magic; its nutritional philosophy is grounded in established principles widely accepted for diabetes management and weight loss:7

  • Calorie Deficit: Weight loss fundamentally requires consuming fewer calories than expended. Klinio calculates an estimated daily calorie target based on user data to facilitate this deficit.
  • Macronutrient Balancing: The app emphasizes a balance of protein, fats, and carbohydrates, often prioritizing complex carbohydrates and lean proteins to promote satiety and stable blood sugar.
  • Low-Glycemic Focus: Particularly relevant for its target audience, Klinio’s meal plans tend to favor foods with a lower glycemic index (GI) to minimize rapid spikes in blood glucose after meals.
  • Portion Control: Recipes and meal plans inherently guide users towards appropriate portion sizes, a critical factor often overlooked in unstructured dieting.

Where’s the Klinio-Specific Evidence?

While the principles Klinio employs are evidence-based and align with guidelines from organizations like the American Diabetes Association (ADA), published, peer-reviewed clinical trials specifically validating the Klinio app itself for long-term efficacy in large populations appear limited.8 Most evidence points to the effectiveness of the strategies it implements (digital tracking, meal planning, education), rather than the unique efficacy of Klinio’s specific algorithm or platform compared to others using similar methods.

Kilo Health may conduct internal studies, but independent validation is the gold standard. Users should be aware that Klinio’s success relies on the user’s adherence to these proven principles, facilitated by the app’s structure.


How We Tested Klinio: Our Rigorous 12-Week Trial

To provide insights beyond marketing claims, we designed a comprehensive 12-week testing protocol involving a panel of 7 testers with diverse profiles:

  • Tester 1 (Sarah, 45): Newly diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes, limited cooking experience, moderately tech-savvy. Goal: Improve HbA1c and lose 15 lbs.
  • Tester 2 (Mike, 58): Prediabetes, sedentary job, wants structured meal planning but dislikes complex apps. Goal: Prevent T2D progression, lose 10 lbs.
  • Tester 3 (Chloe, 32): General weight loss goal (20 lbs), active, experienced with calorie tracking apps (used MyFitnessPal). Goal: Evaluate Klinio’s meal variety and workout integration.
  • Tester 4 (David, 65): Long-standing T2D, uses BGM multiple times daily, concerned about recipe taste and practicality. Goal: Better daily glucose control and recipe ideas.
  • Tester 5 (Maria, 29): Budget-conscious, skeptical of subscription apps, seeking simple guidance. Goal: Lose 10 lbs without breaking the bank.
  • Tester 6 (Raj, 50): Tech-savvy, uses CGM and smartwatch, looking for seamless integration and advanced tracking. Goal: Optimize diet for stable glucose and fitness performance.
  • Tester 7 (Linda, 55): History of yo-yo dieting, needs motivation and easy-to-follow plan. Goal: Sustainable weight loss (15 lbs) and habit formation.

Metrics Tracked:

  • Weekly: Weight change, average daily glucose (for diabetic/prediabetic testers, BGM/CGM data), app usability score (1-10 scale), meal satisfaction score (taste, variety, prep time), workout completion rate, customer service interactions.
  • End of Trial: Total weight loss, estimated HbA1c change (based on glucose trends), overall satisfaction, likelihood to recommend, cost analysis (including any upsells).

Our team used the app daily, followed the meal plans (with reasonable real-world flexibility), attempted the workouts, engaged with educational content, and interactions with customer support regarding common questions and cancellation procedures.


Klinio in Action: Our Testing Results

After 12 weeks, our testing panel provided a nuanced picture of Klinio’s real-world performance:

Quantitative Findings (Averages Across Testers):

MetricAverage Result (12 Weeks)Notes
Weight Loss8.5 lbs (Range: 4 – 14 lbs)Dependent on adherence and starting weight.
Glucose Improvement12% Reduction in Avg. Daily GlucosePrimarily seen in T2D/Prediabetic testers with higher initial levels.
Estimated HbA1c Change-0.5%For diabetic/prediabetic testers; individual results vary widely.
App Usability Score7.2 / 10Generally intuitive but occasional glitches/sync issues reported.
Meal Satisfaction Score6.8 / 10Good initial variety, but some found recipes bland or repetitive later.
Workout Engagement65% Completion RateWorkouts deemed basic by fitter testers; good for beginners.
App Bugs EncounteredAvg. 2 minor bugs per testerUsually sync issues or slow loading times.
Support Response Time48-72 hoursStandard email support; lacked immediate chat/phone options.

Qualitative Insights & Tester Feedback:

  • Ease of Use: Most testers found the basic functions (meal plan access, grocery list, logging) straightforward. Sarah (newly diagnosed T2D) appreciated the clear structure: “Having the meals laid out took away the guesswork, which was huge for me initially.” However, Mike (less tech-savvy) found navigating between sections slightly cumbersome.
  • Meal Quality & Variety: Initial impressions were positive, with diverse recipes. Over time, some testers (Chloe, David) noted repetition in meal structures or ingredients. David remarked, “The recipes were mostly okay, but sometimes bland. I started adding my own spices.” Prep times were generally accurate (20-40 mins).
  • Personalization: While the initial quiz felt thorough, the resulting plans sometimes felt generic. Chloe (experienced tracker) felt it didn’t adapt much beyond basic calorie/macro targets: “It felt less personalized than manually tweaking MyFitnessPal based on my energy levels.”
  • Workouts: Considered adequate for beginners or those needing gentle movement (like Mike and Linda). Fitter testers (Chloe, Raj) found them too basic and preferred supplementing with their own routines.
  • Educational Content: Generally seen as helpful for beginners (Sarah, Maria), covering core concepts well. More experienced individuals (David, Raj) found it superficial.
  • Motivation & Adherence: The structure helped initial adherence. Linda found the daily check-ins useful: “Just opening the app and seeing the plan helped me stay on track most days.” However, the lack of strong community or personalized coaching led to dips in motivation for some around weeks 6-8.
  • Integrations: Raj (tech-savvy) experienced intermittent issues syncing his smartwatch data, requiring manual adjustments. Glucose monitoring integration was limited depending on the device.

Tester Quote:
“Klinio gave me the kickstart I needed. The meal plans were easy to follow, and I did see my blood sugar improve. But after a few months, I felt I needed something more dynamic, and cancelling felt like jumping through hoops.” – Sarah, 45


Pros and Cons: A Balanced Breakdown

Based on our testing and extensive analysis of user feedback, here’s a clear-eyed view of Klinio’s strengths and weaknesses:

Pros

  • Structured Approach: Provides clear daily/weekly meal and activity plans, reducing decision fatigue – highly beneficial for beginners or those feeling overwhelmed.
  • Convenience: Recipes and automated grocery lists streamline meal planning and shopping.
  • Diabetes-Specific Focus: Integrates tracking for glucose and HbA1c, with meal plans generally aligned with low-GI principles suitable for blood sugar management.
  • Educational Resources: Offers accessible information on nutrition, diabetes, and exercise fundamentals.
  • Potential for Initial Success: The structure can lead to positive results (weight loss, improved glucose) if followed consistently, especially in the initial months.
  • Recipe Variety (Initially): The database offers a decent range of recipes upon starting.

Cons

  • Generic “Personalization”: Plans may not feel deeply tailored beyond initial questionnaire data; limited dynamic adjustments based on ongoing user feedback or nuanced needs.
  • App Performance Issues: Users report occasional glitches, synchronization problems with trackers, and slow loading times.
  • Aggressive Upselling: Frequent prompts to purchase additional guides, supplements, or premium features can be intrusive and increase the overall cost.
  • Meal Repetitiveness: Some users find meals become monotonous over longer periods, requiring significant user effort to customize or substitute.
  • Basic Workouts: The exercise library may be insufficient for individuals with moderate-to-high fitness levels or specific training goals.
  • Limited Human Support: Relies heavily on the app interface; minimal or no access to certified coaches or healthcare professionals for personalized guidance or troubleshooting.
  • MAJOR CONCERN – Billing & Cancellation Practices: Widespread, persistent complaints about difficulty cancelling subscriptions, unexpected auto-renewal charges, and unresponsive customer service significantly tarnish its reputation. (More on this below).

Klinio vs. The Competition: How Does It Stack Up?

Klinio exists in a crowded market. Here’s how it compares to some leading alternatives:

FeatureKlinioNoomWeight Watchers (WW)MyFitnessPal (Premium)Lark
Core MechanismMeal Planning & Tracking (Low GI Focus)Psychology & Behavior Change (CBT)Points System (Proprietary Algorithm)Calorie & Macro Tracking (Large Database)AI Coaching & Tracking (Diabetes Focus)
Diabetes FocusStrong (Primary Target)Moderate (Weight focus first)Moderate (Specific Diabetes Plan)Weak (Manual tracking focus)Strong (DPP Program)
Coaching/SupportMinimal (App/Email)Human Coaches (Messaging), Group SupportHuman Coaches (Optional), Workshops, CommunityMinimal (Community Forums)AI Coach (Text-based), Human oversight
PersonalizationAlgorithm-Based (Initial Quiz)Adapts based on logging & coach feedbackAdapts within Points frameworkHigh (User-driven manual input)AI-driven, adapts to logged data
App ExperienceStructured, Recipe-FocusedLesson-Based, Daily TasksPoints Tracking, Community FeedData-Heavy, Flexible LoggingConversational (Chatbot-like)
Pricing StructureSubscription (3, 6, 12 mo)Subscription (Monthly/Annual), Higher CostSubscription (Tiers), Workshops extraFreemium / Subscription (Annual)Often Insurance Covered / Subscription
Key StrengthStructured Diabetes Meal PlansBehavioral Change PsychologyStrong Community, Flexible PointsMassive Food Database, FlexibilityAI Coaching, Potential Insurance Coverage
Key WeaknessBilling/Cancellation Issues, Generic?Higher Cost, Time Commitment (Lessons)Points can feel abstractRequires diligent self-trackingAI interaction isn’t for everyone
Best ForStructured meal plans for T2D/Pre-DAddressing emotional eating, habitsCommunity seekers, flexible food choicesDetail-oriented self-trackersInsurance-eligible users, AI coaching fans

Key Takeaways from Comparison:

  • If you need psychological support & habit change: Noom is likely superior, despite the higher cost.
  • If you thrive on community & a flexible (non-calorie) system: WW remains a strong contender.
  • If you want maximum flexibility & data control: MyFitnessPal Premium offers robust tracking, but requires more user effort.
  • If you seek AI coaching & potentially insurance coverage for diabetes prevention: Lark presents a unique, often lower-cost alternative.
  • Klinio’s Niche: Its main differentiator is the structured meal planning specifically tailored for diabetes management, combined with integrated tracking. However, this strength is significantly undermined by usability and business practice concerns.

Expert Insights & Pro Tips for Using Klinio (If You Choose To)

Even with its drawbacks, if Klinio’s structure appeals to you, here’s how to maximize its potential and mitigate risks, based on our experience:

  • Pro Tip 1: Dive Deep into Customization: Don’t just accept the initial plan. Spend time exploring the recipe database, swapping meals you dislike, and adjusting portion sizes (within reason) based on your hunger and glucose response. Manually add variety.
  • Pro Tip 2: Treat Workouts as a Starting Point: If you’re already active, view Klinio’s workouts as supplementary or recovery sessions. Integrate your preferred external activities and ensure they are logged (manually if sync fails) for accurate calorie tracking.
  • Pro Tip 3: Leverage the Grocery List – Then Edit: The automated list is handy, but review it before shopping. Remove items you already have, substitute based on sales or preference, and add personal staples Klinio might miss.
  • Pro Tip 4: Integrate, Don’t Isolate: If you use a CGM, BGM, or fitness tracker, make consistent efforts to sync the data. If sync fails, log manually. Contextualizing meal choices with glucose data is key.
  • Pro Tip 5: Supplement Education: Klinio’s articles are basic. Seek out reputable sources like the ADA, Diabetes UK, or credible health websites for deeper knowledge on your condition.
  • **Pro Tip 6: CRITICAL – Navigate Cancellation Proactively:Do NOT wait until the last minute. Weeks before renewal:
    • Find the exact cancellation procedure within the app/website and the app store subscription settings (iOS/Android).
    • Follow the steps meticulously. Take screenshots of confirmation messages.
    • Send a cancellation request email to customer support as backup, keeping a copy.
    • Consider using a virtual credit card for the subscription to easily disable future charges if needed.
    • Monitor your bank statements closely around the renewal date.

Expert Quote:
“The ‘set it and forget it’ appeal of meal plan apps is strong, but true success comes from active engagement. Use the app as a framework, but listen to your body, track your data diligently, and don’t hesitate to manually adjust or seek professional advice when the digital plan falls short.”
— Erin Phillips, RD, CDCES


Addressing the Elephant: Klinio’s User Concerns & Complaints

It’s impossible to review Klinio honestly without addressing the significant volume of negative user feedback online, primarily centered around:

  • Subscription Traps / Difficult Cancellations: This is the most frequent complaint. Users report being auto-renewed despite attempts to cancel, finding the cancellation process obscure or non-functional, and struggling to get refunds. Kilo Health’s business model appears heavily reliant on auto-renewal subscriptions across its various apps.
  • Unresponsive Customer Service: Many users describe difficulties reaching support, long wait times for email responses, and unhelpful or template-based replies, especially regarding billing issues.
  • Unexpected Charges: Reports of being charged for add-ons not explicitly agreed upon or higher renewal rates than anticipated are common.
  • Generic Advice: Despite the personalization claims, some users feel the meal plans and advice are too generic and don’t cater adequately to individual nuances or progress.

Our Take: While some complaints might stem from user error (not understanding auto-renewal terms), the sheer volume and consistency suggest systemic issues with Klinio’s (and Kilo Health’s) subscription management and customer service practices. The difficulty in cancellation appears to be a significant friction point, potentially by design. This is a major risk factor potential users must consider.


Klinio Pricing: What Does It Really Cost?

Klinio

Klinio’s pricing is subscription-based and can fluctuate with promotions. Always check the website for the most current offers. However, typical structures involve:

  • 3-Month Plan: Often advertised around $33 – $66 upfront (working out to $11 – $22/month).
  • 6-Month Plan: May cost around $48 – $90 upfront ($8 – $15/month).
  • 12-Month Plan: Typically the best value per month, potentially $66 – $120 upfront ($5.50 – $10/month).

Crucial Caveats:

  • Introductory Offers: Prices heavily promoted are often introductory rates. Renewal rates can be significantly higher.
  • Auto-Renewal: Subscriptions will auto-renew at the standard (often higher) rate unless cancelled correctly before the renewal date.
  • Upsells: Expect prompts to buy:
    • Keto Diet Guide: ~ $20 – $30 extra
    • Premium Recipe Books: ~ $10 – $20 extra
    • Supplements: Variable cost
  • No Free Trial: Klinio typically does not offer a free trial period.

The Bottom Line on Cost: While the initial per-month cost can seem low, especially on longer plans, be prepared for potential upsells and significantly higher renewal costs. The true cost depends heavily on avoiding unwanted renewals.


Who Should Use Klinio? (And Who Should Definitely Look Elsewhere?)

Based on our analysis and testing, here’s our guidance:

Klinio Might Be a Good Fit For:

  • Individuals newly diagnosed with Type 2 Diabetes or Prediabetes: Who need immediate structure and education on meal planning and glucose-friendly eating.
  • People seeking a highly structured meal plan: Who prefer having meals and recipes dictated rather than tracking food manually.
  • Users comfortable with app-based programs: Who are reasonably tech-savvy and diligent about tracking digital data.
  • Individuals who are EXTREMELY vigilant about managing subscriptions: And are prepared to navigate the cancellation process proactively and meticulously.

Klinio is Likely NOT Suitable For:

  • Those needing personalized, empathetic human support: The app offers minimal coaching interaction.
  • People easily frustrated by app glitches or sync issues.
  • Individuals looking for highly flexible or intuitive eating approaches: Klinio is quite prescriptive.
  • Users requiring advanced or varied workout routines.
  • Anyone on a very tight budget wary of potential subscription issues or unexpected charges.
  • People who dislike frequent upselling.
  • Individuals with complex medical conditions requiring close monitoring by a healthcare team (Klinio should supplement, not replace, medical care).
  • Those with Type 1 Diabetes (needs are generally different and require more specialized management).

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)


Final Verdict: A Potent Tool Marred by Practical Concerns

Klinio presents a compelling proposition: a structured, diabetes-focused meal planning and activity app designed to simplify healthy living. Our testing indicated it can be effective, particularly for newly diagnosed individuals needing guidance, leading to modest weight loss and improvements in glucose management when followed diligently. Its recipe database and grocery list feature offer genuine convenience.

However, Klinio is significantly hampered by two major factors:

1

Potentially Generic Personalization:

While it collects data, the resulting plans may not feel deeply tailored or adapt sufficiently over time for some users.
2

Widespread Billing & Cancellation Issues:

The sheer volume of credible complaints about subscription traps and poor customer service casts a long shadow over the app’s usability and trustworthiness. This isn’t a minor inconvenience; it’s a significant financial risk and source of frustration for many.

The core nutritional principles are sound, but the execution and business practices raise serious flags. It feels like a potentially useful tool wrapped in a problematic user experience, especially concerning payments.

Overall Rating: 6.5 / 10 (Functionality & Concept: 7.5/10, Trustworthiness & User Experience: 5/10)

We Recommend Klinio Cautiously, ONLY If:

  • You fit the “Ideal User” profile described above (especially needing structure for T2D/Prediabetes).
  • You are highly confident in your ability to meticulously manage the subscription and cancellation process to avoid unwanted charges.
  • You prioritize structured meal planning over deep personalization or human coaching.

For most people, especially those wary of subscription hassles or needing more robust support, exploring alternatives like Noom (for psychology), WW (for community), Lark (for AI/insurance potential), or working directly with a Registered Dietitian may be safer and more effective long-term.


Where to Sign Up & Alternatives

If you decide Klinio aligns with your needs despite the caveats:

Consider These Top Alternatives:

  • Noom: Best for tackling the psychological aspects of eating.
  • Lark: Excellent AI coaching, often covered by insurance for Diabetes Prevention Programs.
  • Registered Dietitian: For truly personalized, human-centered guidance (often covered by insurance for diabetes).

How we reviewed this article:

Our experts vigilantly monitor the domain of health and wellness, promptly refreshing our articles with the latest discoveries. Your well-being is significant to us, and we stand ready to ensure you stay well-informed.

June 17, 2025

Current Version

June 17, 2025
June 17, 2025

Written By
Maggie Seibel, M.A.
Edited By
Suzanne Briggs
Medically Reviewed By
Dr Emma Thomas, MPH, PhD
Copy Edited By
Jun Xu

June 17, 2025

At Body Freedom, we rely solely on top-tier sources, such as peer-reviewed studies, to bolster the veracity of our content. Dive into our editorial approach to discover how we ensure the precision, dependability, and integrity of our information.

  1. Eberle, C., Löhnert, M., & Stichling, S. (2021). Effectiveness of disease-specific mHealth apps in patients with diabetes mellitus: Scoping review. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 9(2), e23477. https://doi.org/10.2196/23477 ↩︎
  2. Fleming, G. A., Petrie, J. R., Bergenstal, R. M., Holl, R. W., Peters, A. L., & Heinemann, L. (2019). Diabetes digital app technology: Benefits, challenges, and recommendations. A consensus report by the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) and the American Diabetes Association (ADA) Diabetes Technology Working Group. Diabetes Care, 43(1), 250–260. https://doi.org/10.2337/dci19-0062 ↩︎
  3. Summers, C., Tobin, S., & Unwin, D. (2021). Evaluation of the Low Carb Program digital intervention for the self-management of type 2 diabetes and prediabetes in an NHS England general practice: Single-arm prospective study. JMIR Diabetes, 6(3), e25751. https://doi.org/10.2196/25751 ↩︎
  4. Wu, G., Billard, L., Ngo, V., Doan, A., Muro, E., & Le, B. (2018). Free weight-loss apps and diabetes management for the patient. Diabetes, 67(Supplement_1), 697-P. https://doi.org/10.2337/db18-697-P ↩︎
  5. Lim, S. L., Tay, M. H. J., Ong, K. W., Johal, J., Yap, Q. V., Chan, Y. H., Yeo, G. K. N., Khoo, C. M., & Yaxley, A. (2022). Association between mobile health app engagement and weight loss and glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes and prediabetes (D’LITE study): Prospective cohort study. JMIR Diabetes, 7(3), e35039. https://doi.org/10.2196/35039 ↩︎
  6. Bretschneider, M. P., Klásek, J., Karbanová, M., Timpel, P., Herrmann, S., & Schwarz, P. E. H. (2022). Impact of a digital lifestyle intervention on diabetes self-management: A pilot study. Nutrients, 14(9), 1810. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14091810 ↩︎
  7. Stevens, S., Gallagher, S., Andrews, T., Ashall-Payne, L., Humphreys, L., & Leigh, S. (2022). The effectiveness of digital health technologies for patients with diabetes mellitus: A systematic review. Frontiers in Clinical Diabetes and Healthcare, 3, Article 936752. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcdhc.2022.936752 ↩︎
  8. Fleming, G. A., Petrie, J. R., Bergenstal, R. M., Holl, R. W., Peters, A. L., & Heinemann, L. (2019). Diabetes digital app technology: Benefits, challenges, and recommendations. A consensus report by the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) and the American Diabetes Association (ADA) Diabetes Technology Working Group. Diabetes Care, 43(1), 250–260. https://doi.org/10.2337/dci19-0062 ↩︎