Hubble Contacts Review: Convenience vs. Eye Health – Our Expert Analysis

Erika Ferreri, M.A.

Clinical Research Writer

Erika Ferreri has been an Allied Health faculty member since 2004, holding a Master’s in Adult Education and a phlebotomy certification. With over 26 years of healthcare experience, she uses real-life scenarios in teaching, helping many students secure employment in the field.

The allure is undeniable. Sleek packaging arrives at your door, promising clear vision for about a dollar a day.¹ Hubble contact lenses burst onto the scene, disrupting the traditional contact lens market with a direct-to-consumer subscription model built on convenience and aggressive pricing. For millions tired of high costs and optometrist visits, Hubble seemed like the answer.²

But beneath the minimalist branding and tempting $1 introductory offer lies a complex reality that demands scrutiny. Is Hubble’s convenience worth the potential compromise on modern lens technology and, crucially, your long-term eye health? While the price is low, the lenses utilize a material technology that most major manufacturers moved beyond years ago for daily disposable lenses.³

Our team, including product testers and a board-certified optometrist, dedicated over 100 hours to researching, analyzing, and reviewing the Hubble experience. We dove deep into the material science, compared Hubble meticulously against leading competitors, synthesized data from hundreds of user reviews, and conducted a four-week wear trial with five testers. Our goal: to deliver the most comprehensive, authoritative, and unbiased assessment of Hubble contacts available, cutting through the marketing noise to reveal what truly matters for your vision and eye health.

Why Trust Us? Our Rigorous Evaluation Process

Transparency and rigorous testing are paramount when evaluating any medical device, especially one worn directly on the eye. Here’s how we approached our Hubble review:

• Wear Trial: Five experienced daily contact lens wearers tested Hubble lenses for four weeks, experiencing typical daily use (8-12 hours per day).
• Objective Metrics: Testers logged daily comfort scores upon insertion and hourly until removal (using a 1-10 scale), noted instances of dryness requiring rewetting drops, recorded visual acuity stability, and assessed handling characteristics (ease of insertion/removal).
• Expert Medical Review: Dr. Keshia Casimir, O.D., reviewed our testing protocol, analyzed the lens specifications (material, Dk/t, design), and provided critical insights into the potential physiological impacts based on established ophthalmic science. Slit-lamp observations were factored into our assessment.
• Comparative Analysis: We benchmarked Hubble against three leading daily disposable lenses, comparing material technology, oxygen permeability, features like UV blocking, and real-world pricing.⁴
• Market Research: We analyzed data from clinical studies on lens materials, investigated Hubble’s regulatory standing (FDA clearance vs. approval), and synthesized feedback from over 500 verified user reviews across platforms like Trustpilot and Reddit.⁵

Our commitment is to provide you with information grounded in science and real-world implications, empowering you to make the best decision for your eyes.

What Exactly Are Hubble Contacts? The Promise vs. The Product

Hubble’s proposition is simple: deliver affordable daily contact lenses directly to your door via a subscription service.⁶

• The Product: Hubble offers one type of lens – a spherical daily disposable contact lens.
• The Material: The lenses are made from Methafilcon A, a hydrogel material manufactured by St. Shine Optical in Taiwan.⁷
• The Model: Subscription-based. After signing up (requiring prescription verification), users receive regular shipments.
• The Price: The initial hook is for the first shipment containing 30 lenses (15 pairs), essentially a trial. Following this, the cost typically 39 per eye per month, plus shipping, totalling $84 per month for most users needing correction in both eyes. ([Note: Verify current pricing on Hubble’s site before purchasing].)  

The convenience is undeniable. No frantic last-minute dashes to the optometrist for refills.⁸ But the core of any contact lens isn’t the box it comes in; it’s the material sitting on your cornea. And that’s where the Hubble story becomes more complex.⁹

Hubble Contacts

Key Specs: Hubble Daily Contacts

• Material: Methafilcon A (Hydrogel)¹⁰
• Water Content: 55%¹¹
• Oxygen Permeability (Dk/t): Approx. 18-20¹²
• UV Blocking: No¹³
• Manufacturer: St. Shine Optical
• Cost: $1 Intro Offer (15 pairs), then $39/month/eye + $3 shipping

Buy Now

*Prices may vary

The Science Breakdown: Methafilcon A Under the Microscope

The most critical factor differentiating contact lenses is the material, which dictates comfort, hydration, and, most importantly, how much oxygen reaches your cornea. Understanding this is key to evaluating Hubble.

Hydrogel vs. Silicone Hydrogel:
Contact lenses are primarily made from two types of soft plastics:

1. Hydrogels (like Hubble’s Methafilcon A): These were the standard for decades. They hold water well, which initially feels comfortable. However, oxygen reaches the cornea through the water in the lens. Higher water content generally means slightly better oxygen flow for hydrogels, but there’s a ceiling.¹⁴
2. Silicone Hydrogels (The Modern Standard): Introduced in the late 90s/early 2000s, these materials incorporate silicone, which allows oxygen to pass directly through the lens material itself, independent of water content. This results in significantly higher oxygen transmission.¹⁵

Why Oxygen Matters: Dk/t Explained
Oxygen permeability is measured by a value called Dk/t. ‘Dk’ represents the inherent permeability of the material, and ‘t’ is the lens thickness. A higher Dk/t means more oxygen reaches the cornea.¹⁶

• Hubble (Methafilcon A): Has a Dk/t value generally cited around 18-20.
• Modern Daily Silicone Hydrogels: Often boast Dk/t values exceeding 100, with some reaching over 150 (e.g., Alcon Dailies Total1, CooperVision MyDay).¹⁷

That’s a 5x to 8x difference in oxygen transmissibility.

The Health Implications of Low Oxygen (Hypoxia):
Your cornea has no blood vessels; it gets most of its oxygen directly from the air. Covering it with a lens, especially one with low Dk/t, can lead to hypoxia (oxygen deprivation). Potential consequences include:

• Increased Dryness & Discomfort: Oxygen-starved corneas are less healthy and more prone to dryness.¹⁸
• Redness (Limbaugh Hyperemia): Blood vessels at the edge of the cornea dilate trying to supply more oxygen.¹⁹
• Corneal Swelling (Edema): Mild swelling can affect vision quality.²⁰
• Corneal Neovascularization (Long-Term Risk): In chronic hypoxia, tiny blood vessels can grow into the normally clear cornea, potentially impacting vision and contact lens tolerance permanently. This is often asymptomatic until advanced stages.²¹
• Increased Risk of Infections: A compromised cornea is more susceptible to microbial keratitis.²²

While Methafilcon A was acceptable years ago, advancements mean significantly healthier options are now the standard of care recommended by most eye doctors for daily wear.²³ Furthermore, Hubble lenses lack UV blocking, an important feature offered by many modern dailies to help protect against harmful radiation.²⁴

Hands-On Testing: Our Team’s Experience with Hubble

Our five testers wore Hubble daily lenses for four weeks, comparing them to their habitual modern daily disposables. Here’s a summary of their collective experience:

• Initial Comfort: Generally acceptable upon insertion. Testers rated initial comfort an average of 6.5/10. The lenses felt thin, though some noted a slight awareness.
• End-of-Day Comfort: This is where significant issues arose. By the 6-8 hour mark, the average comfort score plummeted to 3/10. All five testers reported noticeable dryness and a gritty sensation.
  • Tester Takeaway: “They felt okay for the first few hours, but by lunchtime, I was reaching for rewetting drops. By evening, I couldn’t wait to take them out. My regular lenses never feel this dry.” – Tester #2
• Dryness: All testers experienced significantly more dryness compared to their usual silicone hydrogel dailies. Four out of five reported needing rewetting drops multiple times throughout the day, starting mid-afternoon.
• Handling: The thinness of the lens made handling slightly tricky for two testers, reporting instances of the lens folding on the fingertip during insertion. Removal was generally straightforward.
• Visual Acuity: Vision was generally reported as clear and stable initially. However, three testers noted slight visual fluctuations or haziness late in the day, likely linked to lens dehydration and surface deposits.
• Redness/Irritation: Slit-lamp evaluation indicated mild conjunctival redness in three testers after 10+ hours of wear, consistent with potential low oxygen or dehydration effects. No serious adverse events were noted during the trial.

Overall Impression: The consensus was clear: while functional for short periods, Hubble lenses did not provide the sustained comfort or end-of-day performance expected from a modern daily disposable lens. The experience aligns with the limitations suggested by its Methafilcon A material and lower oxygen permeability.

Hubble Contacts: The Pros and Cons Unpacked

Based on our analysis, testing, and research, here’s a balanced look at Hubble’s advantages and disadvantages:

The FDA Question: Are Hubble Contacts “FDA Approved”?

This is a common point of confusion. Contact lenses are classified as Class II medical devices by the FDA.

• Hubble lenses (manufactured by St. Shine Optical) have received 510(k) clearance from the FDA. This means the FDA has determined them to be “substantially equivalent” to another legally marketed device (a “predicate device”). It’s a pathway primarily concerned with equivalence, not necessarily independent proof of optimal safety and efficacy through rigorous clinical trials, which is required for “FDA Approval” (typically reserved for Class III devices or new drug applications).
• Hubble lenses are NOT “FDA Approved.” This term implies a higher level of scrutiny and testing than 510(k) clearance provides.

While 510(k) clearance allows Hubble lenses to be legally marketed in the US, it doesn’t equate to an endorsement of their technology as being the current standard of care or optimally safe compared to newer materials. Concerns have also been raised by optometrist groups and the FTC regarding Hubble’s adherence to regulations like the Contact Lens Rule, which mandates proper prescription verification to protect consumers.

Hubble vs. The Competition: Head-to-Head Comparison

How does Hubble stack up against popular, modern daily disposable lenses recommended by eye doctors?

(*Average Monthly Costs are estimates for 2 eyes, based on typical online retail pricing before rebates/insurance, and can vary significantly. Hubble’s cost is fixed at $39/eye + $3 shipping unless changed.)

User Voices: What Real Wearers Say

Synthesizing hundreds of online reviews reveals a polarized picture:

• The Fans: Praise the sheer convenience and predictable cost. Some users with low sensitivity or who wear lenses for very short durations report adequate comfort. “Love not having to think about ordering. They arrive on time, cheap and easy.”
• The Critics: Far more numerous are complaints about dryness, discomfort (especially later in the day), redness, blurry vision, and difficulty wearing them for a full workday. Many report switching back to higher-quality brands despite the cost. Subscription cancellation issues and customer service problems are also common themes. “Felt like sandpaper by 3 PM.” “Worst contacts I’ve ever worn, dried out so fast.” “Impossible to cancel the subscription without a huge hassle.”

Who Should Consider Hubble? (And Who Absolutely Shouldn’t)

Based on our comprehensive evaluation:

Hubble Might Be Tolerable For:

• Extremely Occasional, Short-Duration Wearers: Individuals who only wear contacts for a few hours at a time, a couple of times a month, might find them acceptable, assuming they fit properly.
• Those Prioritizing Convenience/Budget Above All Else: If hassle-free delivery and the lowest possible advertised monthly cost (without considering rebates on other brands) are the absolute top priorities, and you understand the material limitations.
• Current Basic Hydrogel Wearers (with Doctor Guidance): If you’ve successfully worn basic hydrogels without issues and your eye doctor confirms Hubble’s parameters fit you well (this is unlikely for most practitioners to recommend).

Hubble Is Likely NOT Suitable For:

• Anyone Wearing Lenses for Full Workdays (8+ Hours): The low oxygen permeability and potential for dryness make sustained comfortable wear unlikely for most.
• Individuals with Dry or Sensitive Eyes: Hubble lacks the advanced moisture technologies found in modern lenses designed for these conditions.
• Those Needing Astigmatism or Multifocal Correction: Hubble doesn’t offer toric or multifocal lenses.
• Anyone Prioritizing Long-Term Eye Health: The significantly lower oxygen transmission poses unnecessary risks compared to readily available silicone hydrogel alternatives.
• Users Seeking UV Protection: Hubble offers none.
• First-Time Contact Lens Wearers: Beginners need a proper fitting and often benefit from more forgiving, higher-oxygen materials.

Finding Healthier, Modern Alternatives

The good news is that comfortable, healthy contact lens wear is achievable for most people. The crucial first step?

1. Schedule an Eye Exam & Contact Lens Fitting: This is non-negotiable. Your optometrist will assess your eye health, determine your precise prescription, and measure your corneal curvature (base curve) and diameter.
2. Discuss Lens Materials: Talk to your doctor about the benefits of silicone hydrogel daily disposables. Mention your lifestyle, wear time, and any issues like dryness.
3. Trial Different Brands: Doctors typically provide diagnostic lenses of recommended brands (like Dailies Total1, Acuvue Oasys 1-Day, MyDay, Biotrue ONEday, Clariti 1 Day) to try before committing.
4. Shop Smart: Once you have a prescription for a specific modern lens, compare prices at your doctor’s office, major online retailers (1-800 Contacts, Lens.com, etc.), and warehouse clubs. Look for manufacturer rebates, which can significantly lower the cost of premium lenses.

Final Verdict: Our Authoritative Recommendation

Hubble contact lenses successfully identified and targeted a major consumer pain point: the cost and inconvenience of traditional contact lens purchasing. Their subscription model offers undeniable ease, and the initial $1 price point is a masterclass in marketing.

However, our comprehensive analysis concludes that Hubble contacts, due to their reliance on the outdated Methafilcon A hydrogel material with low oxygen permeability, represent a significant step backward in contact lens technology and pose potential risks to long-term corneal health for regular wearers.

While the convenience is high, the comfort often isn’t, especially over a full day. The lack of UV protection and limited parameters further detract from their value. Critically, the monthly cost of $84 is not necessarily cheaper than some superior silicone hydrogel daily lenses available elsewhere, particularly when rebates are considered.

We cannot recommend Hubble contact lenses for regular daily wear. The potential compromises to eye health and comfort in exchange for convenience are, in our expert opinion, not a worthwhile trade-off when numerous healthier, more comfortable, and technologically advanced options are readily available, sometimes at comparable or even lower net costs.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

How we reviewed this article: